home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.ios.com!usenet
- From: larrymb@gramercy.ios.com (UNREGISTERED VERSION)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: The New Ami: a right step!
- Date: 20 Mar 1996 00:30:58 GMT
- Organization: Internet Online Services
- Message-ID: <883.6652T951T2621@gramercy.ios.com>
- References: <883.6648T927T2585@gramercy.ios.com> <DoGyBq.Bnv@info.uucp>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-17.ts-6.hck.idt.net
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- >Well, then... uhm... you're wrong. :)
- >Why is it that so many people shout "Commodore killed the Amiga!", but
- >then they turn around and say that they think that AT should basically
- >take the same route as C= did. Selling overpriced proprietary hardware
- >when "standard" off the shelf hardware will do the job just as well or
- >better is a stupid stupid stupid thing to do. I'd love to run AmigaOS
- >on a PPC machine. However, I likely won't unless I'm able to run it
- >on a PPCP machine so that I don't have to buy my computer from AT.
-
- Oh please, custom chips are hardly the reason CBM failed! I think that their
- mistakes have been gone over more than enough already.
- Also, how's this, when did even those in the known about the Amiga start
- dropping it? When they lost faith that CBM would ever do anything much for the
- chipset. CBM did keep updating the OS. Yet everyone left.
-
-